On the strength of the finite intersection principle

From MaRDI portal
Publication:375889

DOI10.1007/S11856-012-0150-9zbMATH Open1302.03035arXiv1109.3374OpenAlexW3099017129WikidataQ57951143 ScholiaQ57951143MaRDI QIDQ375889FDOQ375889

Carl Mummert, Damir D. Dzhafarov

Publication date: 1 November 2013

Published in: Israel Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We study the logical content of several maximality principles related to the finite intersection principle (FIP) in set theory. Classically, these are all equivalent to the axiom of choice, but in the context of reverse mathematics their strengths vary: some are equivalent to ACA over RCA, while others are strictly weaker, and incomparable with WKL. We show that there is a computable instance of FIP all of whose solutions have hyperimmune degree, and that every computable instance has a solution in every nonzero c.e. degree. In terms of other weak principles previously studied in the literature, the former result translates to FIP implying the omitting partial types principle (mathsfOPT). We also show that, modulo Sigma20 induction, FIP lies strictly below the atomic model theorem (mathsfAMT).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.3374




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (9)





This page was built for publication: On the strength of the finite intersection principle

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q375889)