scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4034288

MaRDI QIDQ3774284zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors W. A. Light

Publication date 1986

zbMATH Keywords

truncated Chebyshev expansiontruncated ultraspherical expansions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Approximation by polynomials (41A10) Asymptotic approximations, asymptotic expansions (steepest descent, etc.) (41A60)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5269406
• Is Gauss Quadrature Better than Clenshaw–Curtis?
• Is a Chebyshev method optimal for an elliptic region also optimal for a nearly elliptic region?
• Chebyshev approximation by exponential differences
• Chebyshev polynomials are not always optimal
• Best Chebyshev approximation of functions of one and many variables
• Comparisons of best approximations with Chebyshev expansions for functions with logarithmic endpoint singularities
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4024604
• The Chebyshev iteration revisited

Cited in

(8)

• Chebyshev domain truncation is inferior to Fourier domain truncation for solving problems on an infinite interval
• New ultraspherical wavelets spectral solutions for fractional Riccati differential equations
• Chebyshev series expansion of inverse polynomials
• New algorithm for the numerical solutions of nonlinear third-order differential equations using Jacobi-Gauss collocation method
• Is Gauss Quadrature Better than Clenshaw–Curtis?
• Accurate spectral solutions for the parabolic and elliptic partial differential equations by the ultraspherical tau method
• Chebyshev approximations for \(\cos \pi x^ 2\) and \(\sin \pi x^ 2\) with applications
• Comparisons of best approximations with Chebyshev expansions for functions with logarithmic endpoint singularities

This page was built for publication:

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3774284)