A conservative test and confidence region for comparing heteroscedastic regressions

DOI10.1093/BIOMET/75.1.149zbMATH Open0635.62063OpenAlexW2056127385MaRDI QIDQ3774752FDOQ3774752

Govind S. Mudholkar, Siddhartha R. Dalal

Publication date: 1988

Published in: Biometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.1.149

Recommendations

• An Approximate Test for Comparing Heteroscedastic Regression Models
• Testing inference in heteroskedastic linear regressions: a comparison of two alternative approaches
• A nonparametric hypothesis test for heteroscedasticity in multiple regression
• A Parametric Bootstrap Test for Comparing Heteroscedastic Regression Models
• Testing for heteroscedasticity in regression models
• On testing a subset of regression parameters under heteroskedasticity
• Testing Hypotheses about Regression Parameters, When the Error Term Is Heteroscedastic

zbMATH Keywords

confidence regionsstrong unimodalityconservative testscomparing heteroscedastic regressionscomparison of two regression planesextension of the Behrens-Fisher problemlog concave distribution function of the error termsStudentized maximum and minimum chi-squared distributionunequal residual variances

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Linear regression; mixed models (62J05)

Cited In (5)

• Reciprocal symmetry, unimodality and Khintchine’s theorem
• Applied regression analysis bibliography update 1988-89
• An Approximate Test for Comparing Heteroscedastic Regression Models
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A Test for the Equality of Parameters for Separate Regression Models in the Presence of Heteroskedasticity

This page was built for publication: A conservative test and confidence region for comparing heteroscedastic regressions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3774752)