Believing the axioms. I

DOI10.2307/2274520MaRDI QIDQ3797175zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Penelope Maddy

Publication date 1988

Published in Journal of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.2307/2274520

zbMATH Keywords

continuum hypothesismeasurable cardinalsinaccessible cardinalsfoundations of set theoryZermelo-Fraenkel axiomsaxiom of constructibilityaxiomatic set theorycontinuum problemsmall large cardinals

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Axiomatics of classical set theory and its fragments (03E30)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 19153
• The Continuum Problem
• Does mathematics need new axioms?
• Axioms for the set-theoretic hierarchy
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5046773

Cited in

(50)

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1390269 (Why is no real title available?)
• The role of axioms in mathematics
• Axioms for the set-theoretic hierarchy
• Realism, nonstandard set theory, and large cardinals
• The search for new axioms in the hyperuniverse programme
• The search for new axioms in the hyperuniverse programme
• GENERIC LARGE CARDINALS AS AXIOMS
• Set-theoretic justification and the theoretical virtues
• In praise of replacement
• Traditional Cavalieri principles applied to the modern notion of area
• Does Mathematics Need New Axioms?
• Must we believe in set theory?
• Self-reference and incompleteness in a non-monotonic setting
• A dilemma in the philosophy of set theory
• The utility of the uncountable
• Finite Mathematics and the Justification of the Axiom of Choicet
• Strong axioms of infinity and the search for \(V\)
• Natural internal forcing schemata extending ZFC: Truth in the universe?
• Reflective mereology
• Inconsistency in mathematics and the mathematics of inconsistency
• Virtue theory of mathematical practices: an introduction
• How to Choose New Axioms for Set Theory?
• Interview With a Set Theorist
• Stable axioms of set theory
• Believing the axioms. II
• Restrictiveness relative to notions of interpretation
• Multiversism and concepts of set: how much relativism is acceptable?
• Explaining maximality through the hyperuniverse programme
• A Dedekind finite Borel set
• Why is the universe of sets not a set?
• Benacerraf, Field, and the agreement of mathematicians
• Towards a theory of mathematical argument
• Mathematics, science and ontology
• Philosophy of mathematics: Prospects for the 1990s
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3847357 (Why is no real title available?)
• True or false? A case in the study of harmonic functions
• AGAINST CUMULATIVE TYPE THEORY
• Asymptotic quasi-completeness and ZFC
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2152250 (Why is no real title available?)
• What makes the continuum ℵ₂
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 998055 (Why is no real title available?)
• Moral epistemology: the mathematics analogy
• The axiom of infinity and transformations \(j: V \rightarrow V\)
• A SECOND PHILOSOPHY OF ARITHMETIC
• Structural relativity and informal rigour
• Strong Statements of Analysis
• Cantorian set theory as an analysis of the actual infinite: past and present between mathematics and philosophy
• On arbitrary sets and ZFC
• Descriptive inner model theory
• Does mathematics need new axioms?

This page was built for publication: Believing the axioms. I

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3797175)