Believing the axioms. I
DOI10.2307/2274520zbMATH Open0652.03033OpenAlexW4244257001WikidataQ55868186 ScholiaQ55868186MaRDI QIDQ3797175FDOQ3797175
Authors: Penelope Maddy
Publication date: 1988
Published in: Journal of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2274520
Recommendations
continuum hypothesismeasurable cardinalsinaccessible cardinalsfoundations of set theoryZermelo-Fraenkel axiomsaxiom of constructibilityaxiomatic set theorycontinuum problemsmall large cardinals
Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Axiomatics of classical set theory and its fragments (03E30)
Cited In (50)
- Realism, nonstandard set theory, and large cardinals
- The search for new axioms in the hyperuniverse programme
- The search for new axioms in the hyperuniverse programme
- Axioms for the set-theoretic hierarchy
- The role of axioms in mathematics
- GENERIC LARGE CARDINALS AS AXIOMS
- Set-theoretic justification and the theoretical virtues
- In praise of replacement
- Does Mathematics Need New Axioms?
- Traditional Cavalieri principles applied to the modern notion of area
- Must we believe in set theory?
- Self-reference and incompleteness in a non-monotonic setting
- The utility of the uncountable
- A dilemma in the philosophy of set theory
- Finite Mathematics and the Justification of the Axiom of Choicet
- Strong axioms of infinity and the search for \(V\)
- Natural internal forcing schemata extending ZFC: Truth in the universe?
- Reflective mereology
- Inconsistency in mathematics and the mathematics of inconsistency
- Virtue theory of mathematical practices: an introduction
- How to Choose New Axioms for Set Theory?
- Interview With a Set Theorist
- Stable axioms of set theory
- Believing the axioms. II
- Restrictiveness relative to notions of interpretation
- Multiversism and concepts of set: how much relativism is acceptable?
- Explaining maximality through the hyperuniverse programme
- A Dedekind finite Borel set
- Why is the universe of sets not a set?
- Benacerraf, Field, and the agreement of mathematicians
- Towards a theory of mathematical argument
- Mathematics, science and ontology
- Philosophy of mathematics: Prospects for the 1990s
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- True or false? A case in the study of harmonic functions
- AGAINST CUMULATIVE TYPE THEORY
- Asymptotic quasi-completeness and ZFC
- What makes the continuum ℵ₂
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The axiom of infinity and transformations \(j: V \rightarrow V\)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Moral epistemology: the mathematics analogy
- A SECOND PHILOSOPHY OF ARITHMETIC
- Strong Statements of Analysis
- Structural relativity and informal rigour
- Cantorian set theory as an analysis of the actual infinite: past and present between mathematics and philosophy
- On arbitrary sets and ZFC
- Does mathematics need new axioms?
- Descriptive inner model theory
- Title not available (Why is that?)
This page was built for publication: Believing the axioms. I
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3797175)