The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
From MaRDI portal
Publication:383023
DOI10.1007/s11229-011-0025-3zbMath1275.91049MaRDI QIDQ383023
Publication date: 25 November 2013
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27596/1/The_theory_of_judgment_aggregation_%28LSERO%29.pdf
democracy; social choice theory; judgment aggregation; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Condorcet's paradox; discursive dilemma
91B14: Social choice
Related Items
Unnamed Item, Unnamed Item, Social Choice Theory, The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation, On Aggregating Probabilistic Evidence, Complexity of manipulation and bribery in premise-based judgment aggregation with simple formulas, Infinite-population approval voting: a proposal, The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation, Judgment aggregation and minimal change: a model of consensus formation by belief revision, Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules, Introduction to judgment aggregation, Judgments aggregation by a sequential majority procedure, Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic, Collective opinion as tendency towards consensus, \textsc{influence}: a partizan scoring game on graphs, Strategic manipulation in judgment aggregation under higher-level reasoning, Logic and majority voting, Arrow on domain conditions: a fruitful road to travel, Complexity of control in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules, Metrizable ordinal proximity measures and their aggregation, Quota rules for incomplete judgments, Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation, Social choice rules driven by propositional logic, An application of Peircean triadic logic: modelling vagueness, Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information, Approximately classic judgement aggregation, Truth approximation, belief merging, and peer disagreement, The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework, Introduction to Judgment Aggregation
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Bayesian group belief
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- The structure of strategy-proof social choice. I: General characterization and possibility results on median spaces
- Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography
- Algebraic aggregation theory
- On the theory of aggregation
- Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
- Consistent Bayesian aggregation
- Arrow's theorem as a corollary
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Marginalization and Linear Opinion Pools
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions
