On words that are concise in residually finite groups.

From MaRDI portal
Publication:392389

DOI10.1016/J.JPAA.2013.04.018zbMATH Open1302.20036arXiv1212.0581OpenAlexW1976677404MaRDI QIDQ392389FDOQ392389


Authors: Cristina Acciarri, Pavel Shumyatsky Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 14 January 2014

Published in: Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A group-word w is called concise if whenever the set of w-values in a group G is finite it always follows that the verbal subgroup w(G) is finite. More generally, a word w is said to be concise in a class of groups X if whenever the set of w-values is finite for a group GinX, it always follows that w(G) is finite. P. Hall asked whether every word is concise. Due to Ivanov the answer to this problem is known to be negative. Dan Segal asked whether every word is concise in the class of residually finite groups. In this direction we prove that if w is a multilinear commutator and q is a prime-power, then the word wq is indeed concise in the class of residually finite groups. Further, we show that in the case where w=gammak the word wq is boundedly concise in the class of residually finite groups. It remains unknown whether the word wq is actually concise in the class of all groups.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.0581




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (26)





This page was built for publication: On words that are concise in residually finite groups.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q392389)