Comparison of a least-square weighted residual method and the Taylor-Galerkin method based on level set formulation for interface capturing
DOI10.1504/PCFD.2011.041016zbMATH Open1278.76055OpenAlexW2135704665MaRDI QIDQ392879FDOQ392879
Authors: Hyoung Gwon Choi
Publication date: 15 January 2014
Published in: Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1504/pcfd.2011.041016
Recommendations
- A least-square weighted residual method for level set formulation
- A direct reinitialization approach of level-set/splitting finite element method for simulating incompressible two-phase flows
- A hybrid particle level set method for improved interface capturing
- An improved level set method for incompressible two-phase flows
- Application of local least squares finite element method (LLSFEM) in the interface capturing of two-phase flow systems
finite element methodincompressible Navier-Stokes equationslevel set methoddirect numerical simulationFEMadvectionfree surface flowDNS3D broken dam flowsleast-squares weighted residual methodreinitialisationTaylor-Galerkin methodtime-reversed vortex flow
Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible viscous fluids (76D05) Finite element methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics (76M10)
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: Comparison of a least-square weighted residual method and the Taylor-Galerkin method based on level set formulation for interface capturing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q392879)