Completeness, invariance and λ-definability
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3947643
Cites work
Cited in
(26)- The Typed Böhm Theorem
- Extended First-Order Logic
- Proofs as processes
- Dependency Tree Automata
- On the existence of closed terms in the typed lambda calculus II: Transformations of unification problems
- The simply typed theory of \(\beta\)-conversion has no maximum extension
- An alternate proof of Statman's finite completeness theorem
- Third order matching is decidable
- Proof of a conjecture of S. Mac Lane
- Kripke-style models for typed lambda calculus
- Recognizability in the Simply Typed Lambda-Calculus
- The IO and OI hierarchies revisited
- An intersection problem for finite automata
- Reflections on a Theorem of Henkin
- Kripke models and the (in)equational logic of the second-order \(\lambda\)-calculus
- Equality between functionals in the presence of coproducts
- A simple proof of a theorem of Statman
- Decidability of all minimal models
- Extensional models for polymorphism
- Linear realizability and full completeness for typed lambda-calculi
- λ-definable functionals andβη conversion
- The typed lambda-calculus is not elementary recursive
- On Church's formal theory of functions and functionals. The \(\lambda\)- calculus: Connections to higher type recursion theory, proof theory, category theory
- Polymorphic rewriting conserves algebraic strong normalization
- Weak typed Böhm theorem on IMLL
- On the \(\lambda Y\) calculus
This page was built for publication: Completeness, invariance and λ-definability
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3947643)