Abstract: Let be a given integer. Let be a family of subsets of . Assume that for every pair of disjoint sets with , there do not exist sets in where subsets of contain and are disjoint from and subsets of contain and are disjoint from . We show that is . Our main new ingredient is allowing, during the inductive proof, multisets of subsets of where the multiplicity of a given set is bounded by . We use a strong stability result of Anstee and Keevash. This is further evidence for a conjecture of Anstee and Sali. These problems can be stated in the language of matrices Let denote copies of the matrix concatenated together. We have established the conjecture for those configurations for any (0,1)-matrix .
Recommendations
Cites work
- A combinatorial problem; stability and order for models and theories in infinitary languages
- A survey of forbidden configuration results
- Bounding one-way differences
- Forbidden configurations, discrepancy and determinants
- Forbidden submatrices
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3717317 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the density of families of sets
- On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities
- Pairwise intersections and forbidden configurations
- Small forbidden configurations. IV: The 3 rowed case
- Unavoidable traces of set systems
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: Repeated columns and an old chestnut
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q396909)