SELECTING “DEMONSTRABLY BEST” OR “DEMONSTRABLY WORST” EXPONENTIAL POPULATIONS
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4029934
DOI10.1111/J.1467-842X.1991.TB00426.XzbMATH Open0781.62028MaRDI QIDQ4029934FDOQ4029934
Authors: Eve Bofinger
Publication date: 1 April 1993
Published in: Australian Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
- A Selection Procedure for Selecting Good Exponential Populations
- New procedures for selecting the \(k\)-best exponential populations
- Sequential and two-stage procedures for selecting the better exponential population covering the case of unknown and unequal scale parameters
- Likelihood based sequential procedures for selecting the best exponential population
- A subset selection procedure for exponential populations
Cited In (8)
- New procedures for selecting the \(k\)-best exponential populations
- Rank verification for exponential families
- Simultaneous estimation after selection and ranking and other procedures: The negative exponential case
- Selecting the Best Exponential Population When the Scale Parameters are Bounded
- A Selection Procedure for Selecting Good Exponential Populations
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The likelihood ratio test for detecting the best treatment among several exponential populations
- A subset selection procedure for exponential populations
This page was built for publication: SELECTING “DEMONSTRABLY BEST” OR “DEMONSTRABLY WORST” EXPONENTIAL POPULATIONS
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4029934)