SELECTING “DEMONSTRABLY BEST” OR “DEMONSTRABLY WORST” EXPONENTIAL POPULATIONS

DOI10.1111/J.1467-842X.1991.TB00426.XMaRDI QIDQ4029934zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Eve Bofinger

Publication date 1 April 1993

Published in Australian Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

selectionlocationscalepreliminary testtwo-parameter exponential populations

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistical ranking and selection procedures (62F07)

Recommendations

• A Selection Procedure for Selecting Good Exponential Populations
• New procedures for selecting the \(k\)-best exponential populations
• Sequential and two-stage procedures for selecting the better exponential population covering the case of unknown and unequal scale parameters
• Likelihood based sequential procedures for selecting the best exponential population
• A subset selection procedure for exponential populations

Cited in

(8)

• Rank verification for exponential families
• Selecting the Best Exponential Population When the Scale Parameters are Bounded
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 426221 (Why is no real title available?)
• The likelihood ratio test for detecting the best treatment among several exponential populations
• A Selection Procedure for Selecting Good Exponential Populations
• A subset selection procedure for exponential populations
• Simultaneous estimation after selection and ranking and other procedures: The negative exponential case
• New procedures for selecting the \(k\)-best exponential populations

This page was built for publication: SELECTING “DEMONSTRABLY BEST” OR “DEMONSTRABLY WORST” EXPONENTIAL POPULATIONS

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4029934)