Smeared versus localised sources in flux compactifications

From MaRDI portal
Publication:407044

DOI10.1007/JHEP12(2010)043zbMATH Open1294.81165arXiv1009.1877MaRDI QIDQ407044FDOQ407044


Authors: Johan Blåbäck, Ulf H. Danielsson, Daniel Junghans, Thomas Van Riet, Timm Wrase, M. Zagermann Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 29 August 2014

Published in: Journal of High Energy Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We investigate whether vacuum solutions in flux compactifications that are obtained with smeared sources (orientifolds or D-branes) still survive when the sources are localised. This seems to rely on whether the solutions are BPS or not. First we consider two sets of BPS solutions that both relate to the GKP solution through T-dualities: (p+1)-dimensional solutions from spacetime-filling Op-planes with a conformally Ricci-flat internal space, and p-dimensional solutions with Op-planes that wrap a 1-cycle inside an everywhere negatively curved twisted torus. The relation between the solution with smeared orientifolds and the localised version is worked out in detail. We then demonstrate that a class of non-BPS AdS_4 solutions that exist for IASD fluxes and with smeared D3-branes (or analogously for ISD fluxes with anti-D3-branes) does not survive the localisation of the (anti) D3-branes. This casts doubts on the stringy consistency of non-BPS solutions that are obtained in the limit of smeared sources.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.1877




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (57)





This page was built for publication: Smeared versus localised sources in flux compactifications

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q407044)