On the interpretive role of theories of gravity and `ugly' solutions to the total evidence for dark matter

DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2014.05.008MaRDI QIDQ407335zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors William L. Vanderburgh

Publication date 29 August 2014

Published in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.05.008

zbMATH Keywords

underdeterminationdark mattergeneral relativityconfirmationtheory testing

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Galactic and stellar dynamics (85A05) Physics (00A79) Einstein's equations (general structure, canonical formalism, Cauchy problems) (83C05) Relativistic cosmology (83F05) Geometrodynamics and the holographic principle (83E05)

Recommendations

• Evidence of dark matter, and the interpretive role of general relativity
• Dark matter, the Equivalence Principle and modified gravity
• Tests of general relativity on astrophysical scales
• Modifying gravity: you cannot always get what you want
• The dark matter problem from f(R) gravity viewpoint

Cites work

• Dark matter, the Equivalence Principle and modified gravity
• Evidence of dark matter, and the interpretive role of general relativity
• Making the case for conformal gravity
• Non-standard models and the sociology of cosmology
• Tensor-vector-scalar-modified gravity: from small scale to cosmology
• What have we learned from observational cosmology?

Cited in

(3)

• Ten arguments against the proclaimed amount of dark matter
• Dark matter, the Equivalence Principle and modified gravity
• Evidence of dark matter, and the interpretive role of general relativity

This page was built for publication: On the interpretive role of theories of gravity and `ugly' solutions to the total evidence for dark matter

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q407335)