Which Response Surface Design Is Best: A Performance Comparison of Several Types of Quadratic Response Surface Designs in Symmetric Regions

DOI10.2307/1268656zbMATH Open0342.62051OpenAlexW4248832172MaRDI QIDQ4110490FDOQ4110490

Authors: James M. Lucas 

Publication date: 1976

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1268656

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Optimal statistical designs (62K05) Factorial statistical designs (62K15)

Cited In (15)

• Machine learning and design of experiments with an application to product innovation in the chemical industry
• A new approach to the construction of optimal designs
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Discussion of ``Response surface design evaluation and comparison by Christine Anderson-Cook, Connie Borror and Douglas Montgomery
• The robustness of response surface designs with errors in factor levels
• A class of composite designs for response surface methodology
• Some response surface designs for finding optimal conditions
• An introduction to designh optimality with an overview of the literature
• An integrative framework for geometric and hidden projections in three-level fractional factorial designs
• New 3-level response surface designs constructed from incomplete block designs
• Finding maximum G-criterion values for central composite designs on the hypercube
• Small response surface designs for metamodel estimation
• Determinant efficiencies in ill-conditioned models
• Response surface optimization for a nonlinearly constrained irregular experimental design space
• On comparing the prediction variances of some central composite designs in spherical regions: a review

This page was built for publication: Which Response Surface Design Is Best: A Performance Comparison of Several Types of Quadratic Response Surface Designs in Symmetric Regions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4110490)