Which Response Surface Design Is Best: A Performance Comparison of Several Types of Quadratic Response Surface Designs in Symmetric Regions

Cited in

(15)

Machine learning and design of experiments with an application to product innovation in the chemical industry
A new approach to the construction of optimal designs
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7578276 (Why is no real title available?)
Discussion of ``Response surface design evaluation and comparison by Christine Anderson-Cook, Connie Borror and Douglas Montgomery
A class of composite designs for response surface methodology
The robustness of response surface designs with errors in factor levels
Some response surface designs for finding optimal conditions
An integrative framework for geometric and hidden projections in three-level fractional factorial designs
An introduction to designh optimality with an overview of the literature
New 3-level response surface designs constructed from incomplete block designs
Finding maximum G-criterion values for central composite designs on the hypercube
Small response surface designs for metamodel estimation
Determinant efficiencies in ill-conditioned models
Response surface optimization for a nonlinearly constrained irregular experimental design space
On comparing the prediction variances of some central composite designs in spherical regions: a review

This page was built for publication: Which Response Surface Design Is Best: A Performance Comparison of Several Types of Quadratic Response Surface Designs in Symmetric Regions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4110490)