Is the Tail Area Useful as an Approximate Bayes Factor?

DOI10.2307/2286921zbMATH Open0352.62022OpenAlexW4237500341MaRDI QIDQ4122622FDOQ4122622

James M. Dickey

Publication date: 1977

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2286921

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Bayesian inference (62F15) Asymptotic properties of parametric tests (62F05) Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10)

Cited In (14)

• Bayesian and frequentist evidence in one-sided hypothesis testing
• The application of robust Bayesian analysis to hypothesis testing and Occam's Razor
• The agreement between the generalized \(p\) value and Bayesian evidence in the one-sided testing problem
• Comparison of the \(p\)-value and posterior probability
• Robust Bayesian analysis: sensitivity to the prior
• A SUITABLE BAYESIAN APPROACH IN TESTING POINT NULL HYPOTHESIS: SOME EXAMPLES REVISITED
• Toward Replicability With Confidence Intervals for the Exceedance Probability
• Quasi-optimal Bayesian procedures of many hypotheses testing
• A new Bayesian procedure for testing point null hypotheses
• Generalized P-values and Bayesian evidence in the one-sided testing problems under exponential distributions
• Lower bounds on Bayes factors for invariant testing situations
• Reconciling Bayesian and frequentist evidence in the point null testing problem
• The Jeffreys-Lindley paradox and discovery criteria in high energy physics
• Bayesian inference given data `significant at \(\alpha\)': Tests of point hypotheses

This page was built for publication: Is the Tail Area Useful as an Approximate Bayes Factor?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4122622)