Comparison of Russell's resolution of the semantical antinomies with that of Tarski
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4163501
Cited in
(23)- The development of the theory of logical types and the notion of a logical subject in Russell's early philosophy
- Cumulative versus noncumulative ramified types
- On the number of types
- On hierarchical propositions
- Why ramify?
- Hierarchical propositions
- Towards transfinite type theory: rereading Tarski's \textit{Wahrheitsbegriff}
- A modern elaboration of the ramified theory of types
- The functions of Russell's no class theory
- Paradoxes of intensionality
- INTENSIONALITY AND PARADOXES IN RAMSEY’S ‘THE FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS’
- The theory of recursive functions, approaching its centennial
- Australasian Association for Logic 1999 Annual Conference Co-Sponsored by The Association for Symbolic Logic
- Russell's way out of the paradox of propositions
- The versatility of universality in \textit{Principia mathematica}
- Russellian Propositions in Principia Mathematica
- Comments on the Contributions
- INCOMPLETENESS VIA PARADOX AND COMPLETENESS
- The prehistory of the subsystems of second-order arithmetic
- A new interpretation of russell's multiple-relation theory of judgment
- A paradox about sets of properties
- Tarskian and Kripkean truth
- Russell-Myhill and grounding
This page was built for publication: Comparison of Russell's resolution of the semantical antinomies with that of Tarski
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4163501)