Parrondo's paradox via redistribution of wealth

From MaRDI portal
Publication:428631

DOI10.1214/EJP.V17-1867zbMATH Open1244.91021arXiv1109.4454OpenAlexW2106587723MaRDI QIDQ428631FDOQ428631


Authors: Stewart N. Ethier, Jiyeon Lee Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 22 June 2012

Published in: Electronic Journal of Probability (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Toral (2002) considered an ensemble of Ngeq2 players. In game B a player is randomly selected to play Parrondo's original capital-dependent game. In game A' two players are randomly selected without replacement, and the first transfers one unit of capital to the second. Game A' is fair (with respect to total capital), game B is losing (or fair), and the random mixture {gamma}A'+(1-{gamma})B is winning, as was demonstrated by Toral for {gamma}=1/2 using computer simulation. We prove this, establishing a strong law of large numbers and a central limit theorem for the sequence of profits of the ensemble of players for each {gamma}in(0,1). We do the same for the nonrandom pattern of games (A')^r B^s for all integers r,sgeq1. An unexpected relationship between the random-mixture case and the nonrandom-pattern case occurs in the limit as N ightarrowinfty.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4454




Recommendations





Cited In (6)





This page was built for publication: Parrondo's paradox via redistribution of wealth

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q428631)