Parrondo's paradox via redistribution of wealth
From MaRDI portal
Publication:428631
Abstract: Toral (2002) considered an ensemble of Ngeq2 players. In game B a player is randomly selected to play Parrondo's original capital-dependent game. In game A' two players are randomly selected without replacement, and the first transfers one unit of capital to the second. Game A' is fair (with respect to total capital), game B is losing (or fair), and the random mixture {gamma}A'+(1-{gamma})B is winning, as was demonstrated by Toral for {gamma}=1/2 using computer simulation. We prove this, establishing a strong law of large numbers and a central limit theorem for the sequence of profits of the ensemble of players for each {gamma}in(0,1). We do the same for the nonrandom pattern of games (A')^r B^s for all integers r,sgeq1. An unexpected relationship between the random-mixture case and the nonrandom-pattern case occurs in the limit as N
ightarrowinfty.
Recommendations
Cited in
(6)- Parrondo effect: exploring the nature-inspired framework on periodic functions
- Proof of a conjecture about Parrondo's paradox for two-armed slot machines
- Limit theorems for Parrondo's paradox
- Parrondo's paradox from classical to quantum: a review
- A discrete dynamical system for the greedy strategy at collective Parrondo games
- How strong can the Parrondo effect be? II
This page was built for publication: Parrondo's paradox via redistribution of wealth
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q428631)