On the local Langlands correspondences of DeBacker-Reeder and Reeder for GL( ,F), where is prime

DOI10.2140/PJM.2012.255.257MaRDI QIDQ429097zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Moshe Adrian

Publication date 26 June 2012

Published in Pacific Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1010.6059, http://msp.berkeley.edu/pjm/2012/255-2/p01.xhtml

zbMATH Keywords

\(p\)-adic groupsLanglands programlocal Langlands correspondencenumber theoryrepresentation theory

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Langlands-Weil conjectures, nonabelian class field theory (11S37) Representations of Lie and linear algebraic groups over local fields (22E50)

Abstract: We prove that the conjectural depth zero local Langlands correspondence of DeBacker/Reeder agrees with the depth zero local Langlands correspondence as described by Moy, for the group $GL(ell,F)$, where $ell$ is prime and F is a local non-archimedean field of characteristic 0. We also prove that if one assumes a certain compatibility condition between Adler's and Howe's construction of supercuspidal representations, then the conjectural positive depth local Langlands correspondence of Reeder also agrees with the positive depth local Langlands correspondence as described by Moy, for $GL(ell,F)$. Specifically, we first work out in detail the construction of DeBacker/Reeder for $GL(ell,F)$, we then restate the constructions in the language of Moy, and finally prove that the correspondences agree. Up to a compatibility between Adler's and Howe's constructions, we then do the same for Reeder's positive depth construction.

Review text

Harris-Taylor and Henniart have independently proven the existence of the local Langlands correspondence for all \(p\)-adic general linear groups \(\mathrm{GL}(n,F)\). That is, they construct a correspondence between the set of irreducible, admissible representations of these groups, and the set of Langlands parameters. Meanwhile, DeBacker and Reeder have constructed a concrete and explicit correspondence between certain depth-zero, supercuspidal representations of more-or-less general reductive \(p\)-adic groups and certain Langlands parameters. For the representations that both correspondences consider, are the correspondences the same? When \(n\) is prime, the paper under review shows that they are.NEWLINENEWLINEMoreover, the paper shows the same for Reeder's conjectural Langlands correspondence involving certain positive-depth supercuspidal representations, provided that Howe's and the reviewer's constructions of these representations parametrize them in the same way.

Recommendations

• La conjecture de Langlands locale pour GL(n,F) modulo quand ≠p, >n
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4108892
• Depth and the local Langlands correspondence
• The local Langlands correspondence for \(\mathrm{GL}_n\) over function fields
• Modular local Langlands correspondence for GL\(_n\)

Cited in

(8)

• Schur algebras of reductive \(p\)-adic groups. I
• An interpretation of the tame local Langlands correspondence for \(p\)-adic \(\mathrm{PGSp}(4)\) from the perspective of real groups
• On the correspondence of representations between 𝐺𝐿(𝑛) and division algebras
• Local Langlands Correspondence for Regular Supercuspidal Representations of GL(n)
• Depth and the local Langlands correspondence
• Endoscopic character identities for depth-zero supercuspidal L-packets
• The classification of irreducible admissible mod \(p\) representations of a \(p\)-adic \(\mathrm{GL}_n\)
• Local Langlands correspondences in -adic coefficients

This page was built for publication: On the local Langlands correspondences of DeBacker-Reeder and Reeder for \(\text{GL}(\ell ,F)\), where \(\ell \) is prime

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q429097)