Comments on the paper by Coveney and Penrose 'On the validity of the Brussels formalism in statistical mechanics'
DOI10.1088/0305-4470/26/15/038zbMATH Open0793.60114OpenAlexW2091795952MaRDI QIDQ4291673FDOQ4291673
Authors: Claude George, I. Prigogine 
Publication date: 11 August 1994
Published in: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/26/15/038
Recommendations
- On the validity of the Brussels formalism in statistical mechanics
- Reply to comments by George and Prigogine on the paper 'On the validity of the Brussels formalism in statistical mechanics'
- Comment on: ``Dynamical foundations of nonextensive statistical mechanics
- Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics Brussels-Austin style
- Reply to: ``Comment on: `Dynamical foundations of nonextensive statistical mechanics
- The statistical dynamics of the Brussellator
- Some comments on developments in exact solutions in statistical mechanics Since 1944
- Comments on ``On \(q\)-non-extensive statistics with non-Tsallisian entropy
long-time asymptoticsLiouville operatorBrussels perturbation methodsquare-integrable phase-space densities
Other physical applications of random processes (60K40) Foundations of equilibrium statistical mechanics (82B03)
This page was built for publication: Comments on the paper by Coveney and Penrose 'On the validity of the Brussels formalism in statistical mechanics'
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4291673)
