Random low-degree polynomials are hard to approximate
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:430841)
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5485538 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3577144 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1324671 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1024657 (Why is no real title available?)
- A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem
- Affine dispersers from subspace polynomials
- Hardness vs randomness
- Lower bounds on the size of bounded depth circuits over a complete basis with logical addition
- Multiparty protocols, pseudorandom generators for Logspace, and time- space trade-offs
- On the density of sets of vectors
- On the trace of finite sets
- On the weight enumeration of weights less than 2.5d of Reed—Muller codes
- On the weight structure of Reed-Muller codes
- Set Systems with Restricted Cross-Intersections and the Minimum Rank ofInclusion Matrices
- Small Sample Spaces Cannot Fool Low Degree Polynomials
- Weight Distribution and List-Decoding Size of Reed–Muller Codes
Cited in
(8)- Algorithmic regularity for polynomials and applications
- On the bias of Reed-Muller codes over odd prime fields
- On active and passive testing
- Covering symmetric sets of the Boolean cube by affine hyperplanes
- Random Low Degree Polynomials are Hard to Approximate
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7758331 (Why is no real title available?)
- On hitting-set generators for polynomials that vanish rarely
- Reed-Muller Codes
This page was built for publication: Random low-degree polynomials are hard to approximate
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q430841)