Gaussian Elimination with Partial Pivoting Can Fail in Practice
DOI10.1137/S0895479892239755zbMATH Open0806.65022OpenAlexW1976662650MaRDI QIDQ4313383FDOQ4313383
Authors: Leslie Foster 
Publication date: 16 November 1994
Published in: SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/s0895479892239755
Recommendations
numerical stabilityfirst-order differential equationVolterra integral equations of the second kinderror growthGaussian elimination with partial pivoting
Direct numerical methods for linear systems and matrix inversion (65F05) Roundoff error (65G50) Numerical methods for integral equations (65R20) Numerical solution of boundary value problems involving ordinary differential equations (65L10)
Cited In (11)
- Growth factor and expected growth factor of some pivoting strategies
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A collection of examples where Neville elimination outperforms Gaussian elimination
- Hadamard matrices: insights into their growth factor and determinant computations
- The growth factor and efficiency of Gaussian elimination with rook pivoting
- Floating-point arithmetic on the test bench. How are verified numerical solutions calculated?
- Gaussian elimination: When is scaling beneficial!
- On the robustness of Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting
- Random matrices generating large growth in LU factorization with pivoting
- Probabilistic analysis of complex Gaussian elimination without pivoting
- Some new results on the maximum growth factor in Gaussian elimination
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Gaussian Elimination with Partial Pivoting Can Fail in Practice
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4313383)
