Type-I intermittency with noise versus eyelet intermittency

From MaRDI portal
Publication:432952

DOI10.1016/J.PHYSLETA.2011.02.032zbMATH Open1242.34059arXiv1302.4082OpenAlexW2128806089MaRDI QIDQ432952FDOQ432952


Authors: A. E. Khramov, A. A. Koronovskij, Maria K. Kurovskaya, O. I. Moskalenko Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 4 July 2012

Published in: Physics Letters. A (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In this article we compare the characteristics of two types of the intermittent behavior (type-I intermittency in the presence of noise and eyelet intermittency taking place in the vicinity of the chaotic phase synchronization boundary) supposed hitherto to be different phenomena. We show that these effects are the same type of dynamics observed under different conditions. The correctness of our conclusion is confirmed by the consideration of different sample systems, such as quadratic map, Van der Pol oscillator and Rossler system. Consideration of the problem concerning the upper boundary of the intermittent behavior also confirms the validity of the statement on the equivalence of type-I intermittency in the presence of noise and eyelet intermittency observed in the onset of phase synchronization.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.4082




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (7)





This page was built for publication: Type-I intermittency with noise versus eyelet intermittency

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q432952)