A note on the difference between two likelihood based methods in growth curves
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4337252
DOI10.1080/03610929608831823zbMATH Open0900.62401OpenAlexW2066835010MaRDI QIDQ4337252FDOQ4337252
Authors: Vassilis G. S. Vasdekis 
Publication date: 19 May 1997
Published in: Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929608831823
Recommendations
- A Comparison of REML and Covariance Adjustment Method in the Estimation of Growth Curve Models
- On the difference between ML and REML estimators in the modelling of multivariate longitudinal data
- Restricted maximum likelihood estimation under Eisenhart model Ill
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2102891
Cites Work
- Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems
- Bayesian inference for variance components using only error contrasts
- An Approach to the Analysis of Repeated Measurements
- The Effect of Covariance Structure on Variance Estimation in Balanced Growth-Curve Models with Random Parameters
- Monte Carlo Comparison of ANOVA, MIVQUE, REML, and ML Estimators of Variance Components
- Bias of ml and reml estimators in regression models with arma errors
- On a class of change-point models in covariance structures for growth curves and repeated measurements
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: A note on the difference between two likelihood based methods in growth curves
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4337252)
