A note on the difference between two likelihood based methods in growth curves
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:4337252)
Recommendations
- A Comparison of REML and Covariance Adjustment Method in the Estimation of Growth Curve Models
- On the difference between ML and REML estimators in the modelling of multivariate longitudinal data
- Restricted maximum likelihood estimation under Eisenhart model Ill
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2102891
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3522963 (Why is no real title available?)
- An Approach to the Analysis of Repeated Measurements
- Bayesian inference for variance components using only error contrasts
- Bias of ml and reml estimators in regression models with arma errors
- Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems
- Monte Carlo Comparison of ANOVA, MIVQUE, REML, and ML Estimators of Variance Components
- On a class of change-point models in covariance structures for growth curves and repeated measurements
- Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
- The Effect of Covariance Structure on Variance Estimation in Balanced Growth-Curve Models with Random Parameters
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: A note on the difference between two likelihood based methods in growth curves
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4337252)
