Lyapunov vs. Geometrical stability analysis of the Kepler and the restricted three body problems
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:434081)
Abstract: In this letter we show that although the application of standard Lyapunov analysis predicts that completely integrable Kepler motion is unstable, the geometrical analysis of Horwitz et al [1] predicts the observed stability. This seems to us to provide evidence for both the incompleteness of the standard Lyapunov analysis and the strength of the geometrical analysis. Moreover, we apply this approach to the three body problem in which the third body is restricted to move on a circle of large radius which induces an adiabatic time dependent potential on the second body. This causes the second body to move in a very interesting and intricate but periodic trajectory; however, the standard Lyapunov analysis, as well as methods based on the parametric variation of curvature associated with the Jacobi metric, incorrectly predict chaotic behavior. The geometric approach predicts the correct stable motion in this case as well.
Recommendations
- Stability of the periodic solutions of the restricted three-body problem representing analytic continuations of Keplerian rectilinear periodic motions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4009867
- Analytical continuation of stability of periodic orbits in the restricted three-body problem
- Stability of periodic orbits in the elliptic, restricted three-body problem.
- The instability transition for the restricted 3-body problem. III: The Lyapunov exponent criterion
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4064568
- Stability in the restricted problem of three bodies with Liapounov Characteristic Numbers
- On the stability of Lagrange solutions in the spatial near-circular restricted three-body problem
- On the instability of Lagrange solutions in the three-body problem
- On the Lagrange Stability of Motion in the Three-Body Problem
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3148054 (Why is no real title available?)
- An extended geometric criterion for chaos in the Dicke model
- Geometry and topology in Hamiltonian dynamics and statistical mechanics
- On the absence of stable periodic orbits in domains of separatrix crossings in nonsymmetric slow-fast Hamiltonian systems
- The Pioneer anomaly
Cited in
(8)- Uncertainty relation for chaos
- On the stability of Hamiltonian systems with weakly time dependent potentials
- Subtle is the lord: on the difference between Newtonian (Lyapunov) stability analysis and geometrical stability analysis of gravitational orbits
- Geometry of Hamiltonian dynamics with conformal Eisenhart metric
- Curvature and geodesic instabilities in a geometrical approach to the planar three-body problem
- Short time Lyapunov indicators in the restricted three-body problem
- Stabilization of Lagrange points in circular restricted three-body problem: a port-Hamiltonian approach
- On the Lyapunov theory of equilibrium figures of celestial bodies
This page was built for publication: Lyapunov vs. Geometrical stability analysis of the Kepler and the restricted three body problems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q434081)