Lyapunov vs. Geometrical stability analysis of the Kepler and the restricted three body problems

From MaRDI portal
Publication:434081

DOI10.1016/J.PHYSLETA.2011.04.016zbMATH Open1242.70017arXiv0908.1124OpenAlexW2073337581MaRDI QIDQ434081FDOQ434081


Authors: A. Yahalom, J. Levitan, M. Lewkowicz, L. Horwitz Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 9 July 2012

Published in: Physics Letters. A (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In this letter we show that although the application of standard Lyapunov analysis predicts that completely integrable Kepler motion is unstable, the geometrical analysis of Horwitz et al [1] predicts the observed stability. This seems to us to provide evidence for both the incompleteness of the standard Lyapunov analysis and the strength of the geometrical analysis. Moreover, we apply this approach to the three body problem in which the third body is restricted to move on a circle of large radius which induces an adiabatic time dependent potential on the second body. This causes the second body to move in a very interesting and intricate but periodic trajectory; however, the standard Lyapunov analysis, as well as methods based on the parametric variation of curvature associated with the Jacobi metric, incorrectly predict chaotic behavior. The geometric approach predicts the correct stable motion in this case as well.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1124




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (8)





This page was built for publication: Lyapunov vs. Geometrical stability analysis of the Kepler and the restricted three body problems

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q434081)