Relations for \(m\)-generalized order statistics via an Opial-type inequality
From MaRDI portal
Publication:434547
DOI10.1016/j.jspi.2011.12.026zbMath1243.62065MaRDI QIDQ434547
Publication date: 16 July 2012
Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2011.12.026
60E15: Inequalities; stochastic orderings
62E15: Exact distribution theory in statistics
62G30: Order statistics; empirical distribution functions
62G32: Statistics of extreme values; tail inference
Related Items
Distances between models of generalized order statistics, Concomitants of \(m\)-generalized order statistics from generalized Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern distribution family
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Lower bounds on the expectations of upper record values
- Inequalities for moments of order statistics and characterizations of distributions
- Moment inequalities for order statistics with applications to characterizations of distributions
- Relations, bounds and approximations for order statistics
- Opial-type inequalities involving higher order differences
- Unimodality of uniform generalized order statistics, with applications to mean bounds
- Remarks on the generalizations of Opial's inequality
- A concept of generalized order statistics
- Extensions of Pi Opial's inequality
- Sur une inégalité
- A simple proof of a certain result of Z. Opial
- Lower Bounds on PositiveL-Statistics
- Projection bounds on expectations of generalized order statistics from DFR and DFRA families
- On Families of Distributions for Which Optimal Bounds on Expectations of GOS Can be Derived
- Evaluations of expected generalized order statistics in various scale units
- On a certain result of Z. Opial
- Shorter Notes: An Even Simpler Proof of Opial's Inequality
- Analytic Inequalities
- On an Integral Inequality of Z. Opial
- Projecting statistical functionals
- Sharp distribution-free bounds on the bias in estimating quantiles via order statistics