The Effect of Variance Function Estimation on Nonlinear Calibration Inference in Immunoassay Data
DOI10.2307/2533153zbMATH Open0876.62090OpenAlexW2316901661WikidataQ36834281 ScholiaQ36834281MaRDI QIDQ4348985FDOQ4348985
Marie Davidian, David M. Giltinan, Bruce A. Belanger
Publication date: 10 August 1997
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2533153
heteroscedasticityconfidence intervalimmunoassaysgeneralized least squaresdrug developmentvariance function estimation
General nonlinear regression (62J02) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)
Cited In (7)
- Applications of Likelihood Asymptotics for Nonlinear Regression in Herbicide Bioassays
- A Robust Bayesian Random Effects Model for Nonlinear Calibration Problems
- Calibration for Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models: An Application to the Withdrawal Time Prediction
- Simultaneous optimality of LSE and ANOVA estimate in general mixed models
- The Effect of Serial Dilution Error on Calibration Inference in Immunoassay
- Simultaneous optimal estimates of fixed effects and variance components in the mixed model
- A reliable method of estimating the variance function in immunoassay
Recommendations
- Bootstrap-Adjusted Calibration Confidence Intervals for Immunoassay π π
- Variance functions and the minimum detectable concentration in assays π π
- Calibration Inference Based on Multiple Runs of an Immunoassay π π
- Estimation of variance functions in assays with possibly unequal replication and nonnormal data π π
- The Effect of Serial Dilution Error on Calibration Inference in Immunoassay π π
This page was built for publication: The Effect of Variance Function Estimation on Nonlinear Calibration Inference in Immunoassay Data
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4348985)