Are the dimensions of a set and its image equal under typical smooth functions?
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:4353844)
Recommendations
Cited in
(22)- Discriminating dynamical from additive noise in the Van der Pol oscillator
- Convolutions of Cantor measures without resonance
- (Non)regularity of projections of measures invariant under geodesic flow
- Smoothness of projections, Bernoulli convolutions, and the dimension of exceptions
- Transformations preserving the Hausdorff-Besicovitch dimension
- Invariant measures for parabolic IFS with overlaps and random continued fractions
- Dimension distortion by Sobolev mappings in foliated metric spaces
- L'image de la limite supérieure d'une famille d'ensembles est-elle égale à la limite supérieure de la famille des images ?
- Some New Concepts of Dimension
- Correlation dimension for iterated function systems
- Projections of measures invariant under the geodesic flow
- A probabilistic Takens theorem
- Detecting recursive and nonrecursive filters using chaos
- Prevalence
- Local dimensions of sliced measures and stability of packing dimensions of sections of sets
- Dimensions of projected sets and measures on typical self-affine sets
- A class of probability distribution functions preserving the packing dimension
- Regularity of almost-surely injective projections in Euclidean spaces
- A note on the 1-prevalence of continuous images with full Hausdorff dimension
- Heavy particles in incompressible flows: the large Stokes number asymptotics
- Observing Lyapunov exponents of infinite-dimensional dynamical systems
- Stochastic suspensions of heavy particles
This page was built for publication: Are the dimensions of a set and its image equal under typical smooth functions?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4353844)