A Field Experiment Comparing Anchored and Unanchored Criteria Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

DOI10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199705)6:3%3C140::AID-MCDA128%3E3.0.CO;2-TzbMATH Open0889.90095OpenAlexW2087286091MaRDI QIDQ4368570FDOQ4368570

Authors: Cynthia F. Hadley, Bertram Schoner, William C. Wedley 

Publication date: 4 December 1997

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1360(199705)6:3%3C140::aid-mcda128%3E3.0.co;2-t

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1241890
• The sensitivity of the analytic hierarchy process to alternative scale and cue presentations
• A careful look at the importance of criteria and weights
• On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods.

zbMATH Keywords

multicriteria decision makinganalytic hierarchy processabsolute measurement mode

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Decision theory (91B06)

Cited In (1)

• An evaluation of multi‐criteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy

This page was built for publication: A Field Experiment Comparing Anchored and Unanchored Criteria Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4368570)