A Field Experiment Comparing Anchored and Unanchored Criteria Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

DOI10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199705)6:3%3C140::AID-MCDA128%3E3.0.CO;2-TMaRDI QIDQ4368570zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Cynthia F. Hadley, Bertram Schoner, William C. Wedley

Publication date 4 December 1997

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1360(199705)6:3%3C140::aid-mcda128%3E3.0.co;2-t

zbMATH Keywords

multicriteria decision makinganalytic hierarchy processabsolute measurement mode

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Decision theory (91B06)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1241890
• The sensitivity of the analytic hierarchy process to alternative scale and cue presentations
• A careful look at the importance of criteria and weights
• On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods.

Cited in

(1)

• An evaluation of multi‐criteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy

This page was built for publication: A Field Experiment Comparing Anchored and Unanchored Criteria Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4368570)