A Field Experiment Comparing Anchored and Unanchored Criteria Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

DOI10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199705)6:3%3C140::AID-MCDA128%3E3.0.CO;2-TzbMATH Open0889.90095OpenAlexW2087286091MaRDI QIDQ4368570FDOQ4368570

Bertram Schoner, William C. Wedley, Cynthia F. Hadley

Publication date: 4 December 1997

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1360(199705)6:3%3C140::aid-mcda128%3E3.0.co;2-t

zbMATH Keywords

multicriteria decision makinganalytic hierarchy processabsolute measurement mode

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Decision theory (91B06)

Cited In (1)

• An evaluation of multi‐criteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy

   Recommendations

• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• The sensitivity of the analytic hierarchy process to alternative scale and cue presentations 👍 👎
• A careful look at the importance of criteria and weights 👍 👎
• On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods. 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: A Field Experiment Comparing Anchored and Unanchored Criteria Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4368570)