Limitations of traditional finite volume discretizations for unsteady computational fluid dynamics

DOI10.2514/3.13191zbMATH Open0912.76058OpenAlexW1992876873WikidataQ61729347 ScholiaQ61729347MaRDI QIDQ4373150FDOQ4373150

Authors: J. R. Manson, Gareth Pender, S. G. Wallis 

Publication date: 30 May 1999

Published in: AIAA Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2514/3.13191

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3945716
• Evaluation of TVD high-resolution schemes for unsteady viscous shocked flows
• High Resolution Monotonicity-Preserving Schemes for Unsteady Compressible Flows
• The analysis of unsteady incompressible flows by a three‐step finite element method
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1301981

zbMATH Keywords

time stepCourant conditionLeonard's QUICKEST-type differencingone-dimensional time-dependent convection equation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cited In (5)

• Intrinsic features of flow-induced stability of a square cylinder
• Time-implicit gas-kinetic scheme
• Aerodynamic forces on square cylinder due to secondary flow by rectangular vortex generator in offset tandem: comparison with inline
• Vibrations of a square cylinder submerged in a wake
• Accuracy characteristics of traditional finite volume discretizations for unsteady computational fluid dynamics

This page was built for publication: Limitations of traditional finite volume discretizations for unsteady computational fluid dynamics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4373150)