Limitations of traditional finite volume discretizations for unsteady computational fluid dynamics

DOI10.2514/3.13191MaRDI QIDQ4373150zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors J. R. Manson, Gareth Pender, S. G. Wallis

Publication date 30 May 1999

Published in AIAA Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.2514/3.13191

zbMATH Keywords

Courant conditionLeonard's QUICKEST-type differencingone-dimensional time-dependent convection equationtime step

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3945716
• Evaluation of TVD high-resolution schemes for unsteady viscous shocked flows
• High Resolution Monotonicity-Preserving Schemes for Unsteady Compressible Flows
• The analysis of unsteady incompressible flows by a three‐step finite element method
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1301981

Cited in

(5)

• Accuracy characteristics of traditional finite volume discretizations for unsteady computational fluid dynamics
• Aerodynamic forces on square cylinder due to secondary flow by rectangular vortex generator in offset tandem: comparison with inline
• Time-implicit gas-kinetic scheme
• Vibrations of a square cylinder submerged in a wake
• Intrinsic features of flow-induced stability of a square cylinder

This page was built for publication: Limitations of traditional finite volume discretizations for unsteady computational fluid dynamics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4373150)