The consistency of ZFC + 2ℵ0 > ℵω + ℐ(ℵ2) = ℐ(ℵω)
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4382465
DOI10.2307/2275632zbMATH Open0897.03052arXivmath/9603219OpenAlexW1536863443MaRDI QIDQ4382465FDOQ4382465
Authors: Martin Philip Gilchrist, S. Shelah
Publication date: 19 October 1998
Published in: Journal of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: An omega-coloring is a pair <f,B> where f:[B]^{2} ---> omega. The set B is the field of f and denoted Fld(f). Let f,g be omega-colorings. We say that f realizes the coloring g if there is a one-one function k:Fld(g) ---> Fld(f) such that for all {x,y}, {u,v} in dom(g) we have f({k(x),k(y)}) not= f({k(u),k(v)}) => g({x,y}) not= g({u,v}). We write f~g if f realizes g and g realizes f. We call the ~-classes of omega-colorings with finite fields identities. We say that an identity I is of size r if |Fld(f)|=r for some/all f in I. For a cardinal kappa and f:[kappa]^2 ---> omega we define I(f) to be the collection of identities realized by f and I (kappa) to be bigcap {I(f)| f:[kappa]^2 ---> omega}. We show that, if ZFC is consistent then ZFC + 2^{aleph_0}> aleph_omega + I(aleph_2)=I(aleph_omega) is consistent.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9603219
Recommendations
Coloring of graphs and hypergraphs (05C15) Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Consistency and independence results (03E35)
Cites Work
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: The consistency of ZFC + 2ℵ0 > ℵω + ℐ(ℵ2) = ℐ(ℵω)
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4382465)