Accuracy versus convenience: a simulation-based comparison of two continuous imputation models for incomplete ordinal longitudinal clinical trials data
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:440145)
Recommendations
- A Simulation Study Comparing Multiple Imputation Methods for Incomplete Longitudinal Ordinal Data
- Analyzing data with missing continuous covariates by multiple imputation using proper impu\-tation
- Multiple Imputation for Longitudinal Data Under a Bayesian Multilevel Model
- Multiple imputation for ordinal longitudinal data with monotone missing data patterns
- Multiple imputation for discrete data: evaluation of the joint latent normal model
Cited in
(10)- Comparison of alternative imputation methods for ordinal data
- Multiple Imputation for Longitudinal Data Under a Bayesian Multilevel Model
- Development of a common patient assessment scale across the continuum of care: a nested multiple imputation approach
- A Lasso and a regression tree mixed-effect model with random effects for the level, the residual variance, and the autocorrelation
- On imputing continuous data when the eventual interest pertains to ordinalized outcomes via threshold concept
- Practical Advice on How to Impute Continuous Data When the Ultimate Interest Centers on Dichotomized Outcomes Through Pre-Specified Thresholds
- Analyzing data with missing continuous covariates by multiple imputation using proper impu\-tation
- Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials
- A distance-based rounding strategy for post-imputation ordinal data
- A Simulation Study Comparing Multiple Imputation Methods for Incomplete Longitudinal Ordinal Data
This page was built for publication: Accuracy versus convenience: a simulation-based comparison of two continuous imputation models for incomplete ordinal longitudinal clinical trials data
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q440145)
