Does fully developed turbulence exist? Reynolds number independence versus asymptotic covariance

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4425640

DOI10.1063/1.868685zbMATH Open1026.76529arXivcond-mat/9507132OpenAlexW3105325790WikidataQ29028134 ScholiaQ29028134MaRDI QIDQ4425640FDOQ4425640


Authors: G. I. Barenblatt, Nigel Goldenfeld Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 9 December 2003

Published in: Physics of Fluids (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: By analogy with recent arguments concerning the mean velocity profile of wall-bounded turbulent shear flows, we suggest that there may exist corrections to the 2/3 law of Kolmogorov, which are proportional to (ln,Re)1 at large Re. Such corrections to K41 are the only ones permitted if one insists that the functional form of statistical averages at large Re be invariant under a natural redefinition of Re. The family of curves of the observed longitudinal structure function DLL(r,Re) for different values of Re is bounded by an envelope. In one generic scenario, close to the envelope, DLL(r,Re) is of the form assumed by Kolmogorov, with corrections of O((lnRe)2). In an alternative generic scenario, both the Kolmogorov constant CK and corrections to Kolmogorov's linear relation for the third order structure function DLLL(r) are proportional to (ln,Re)1. Recent experimental data of Praskovsky and Oncley appear to show a definite dependence of CK on Re, which if confirmed, would be consistent with the arguments given here.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9507132






Cites Work


Cited In (12)





This page was built for publication: Does fully developed turbulence exist? Reynolds number independence versus asymptotic covariance

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4425640)