Chebyshev’s bias for composite numbers with restricted prime divisors

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4433141

DOI10.1090/S0025-5718-03-01536-9zbMATH Open1045.11063arXivmath/0112100MaRDI QIDQ4433141FDOQ4433141


Authors: Pieter Moree Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 29 October 2003

Published in: Mathematics of Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Let P(x,d,a) denote the number of primes p<=x with p=a(mod d). Chebyshev's bias is the phenomenon that `more often' P(x;d,n)>P(x;d,r) than the other way around, where n is a quadratic non-residue mod d and r is a quadratic residue mod d. If P(x;d,n)>=P(x;d,r) for every x up to some large number, then one expects that N(x;d,n)>=N(x;d,r) for every x. Here N(x;d,a) denotes the number of integers n<=x such that every prime divisor p of n satisfies p=a(mod d). In this paper we develop some tools to deal with this type of problem and apply them to show that, for example, N(x;4,3)>=N(x;4,1) for every x. In the process we express the so called second order Landau-Ramanujan constant as an infinite series and show that the same type of formula holds true for a much larger class of constants. In a sequel to this paper the methods developed here will be used and somewhat refined to resolve a conjecture from P. Schmutz Schaller to the extent that the hexagonal lattice is `better' than the square lattice (see p. 201 of Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 35 (1998), 193-214).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0112100




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (13)





This page was built for publication: Chebyshev’s bias for composite numbers with restricted prime divisors

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4433141)