Abstract: The EPR paradox and the meaning of the Bell inequality are discussed. It is shown that considering the quantum objects as carrying with them instruction kits telling them what to do when meeting a measurement apparatus any paradox disappears. In this view the quantum state is characterized by the prescribed behaviour rather than by the specific value a parameter assumes as a result of an interaction.
Recommendations
Cited in
(9)- Quantum object as a system with memory
- On Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
- EPR: how subtle is the Lord and how is the Lord subtle?
- How far do EPR-Bell experiments constrain physical collapse theories?
- ON THE EPR–CHAMELEON EXPERIMENT
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1441317 (Why is no real title available?)
- Propositional counter-factual definiteness and the EPR paradox
- Kolmogorov Probability Spaces Describing Accardi Models of Quantum Correlations
- The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and the Bell inequality in a quantum system with memory
This page was built for publication: Is the EPR paradox really a paradox?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4433274)
