When a mass term does not represent a mass
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4433656
Abstract: The definition of mass of a scalar field in a curved space has often been generalized by grouping coupling terms between the field and the Ricci curvature with non-curvature-related mass terms. In a broader point of view, one sees that a common misunderstanding resulting from such an identification leads one, in the case of the spin 2 field, to regard the cosmological constant as a non-vanishing mass of cosmological origin for the graviton. Similarly, there are inconsistencies for the spin 1 field. Instead, the intrinsic mass of a field should be regarded as being independent of the background curvature.
Recommendations
Cited in
(8)- De Sitter relativity: a new road to quantum gravity?
- Space-time philosophy reconstructed \textit{via} massive Nordström scalar gravities? Laws \textit{vs.} geometry, conventionality, and underdetermination
- Addendum to: ``A note on spin-2 fields in curved backgrounds
- Scalar field mass in generalized gravity
- Higgs mechanism in the Randall-Sundrum model
- On vacuum fluctuations and particle masses
- Scalar mass and the cosmological constant
- Massive Nordström scalar (density) gravities from universal coupling
This page was built for publication: When a mass term does not represent a mass
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4433656)