When a mass term does not represent a mass

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4433656

DOI10.1088/0143-0807/19/5/002zbMATH Open1032.83506arXivphysics/9807056OpenAlexW3098854416MaRDI QIDQ4433656FDOQ4433656

F. I. Cooperstock, Valerio Faraoni

Publication date: 3 December 2003

Published in: European Journal of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The definition of mass of a scalar field in a curved space has often been generalized by grouping coupling terms between the field and the Ricci curvature with non-curvature-related mass terms. In a broader point of view, one sees that a common misunderstanding resulting from such an identification leads one, in the case of the spin 2 field, to regard the cosmological constant as a non-vanishing mass of cosmological origin for the graviton. Similarly, there are inconsistencies for the spin 1 field. Instead, the intrinsic mass of a field should be regarded as being independent of the background curvature.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9807056




Recommendations





Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: When a mass term does not represent a mass

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4433656)