Weight approximations in multi-attribute decision models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4452459
DOI10.1002/MCDA.320zbMATH Open1103.90360OpenAlexW2060281597MaRDI QIDQ4452459FDOQ4452459
Authors: Ron Roberts, Paul Goodwin 
Publication date: 12 February 2004
Published in: Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.320
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2059783
- Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights
- Rank-order weighting as a surrogate for direct weighting
- A note on using centroid weights in additive multi-criteria decision analysis
- Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights
Cites Work
Cited In (24)
- A hybrid trapezoidal fuzzy FUCOM-AHP approach and their application to identification of monkeypox risk factors
- Weighted cautious conjunctive rule for belief functions combination
- Weight sensitivity measurement, analysis, and application in multi-attribute evaluation
- A note on using centroid weights in additive multi-criteria decision analysis
- Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach
- Deriving Public Transport Level of Service Weights from a Multiple Comparison of Latent and Observable Variables
- DETERMINING AGGREGATE CRITERIA WEIGHTS FROM CRITERIA RANKINGS BY A GROUP OF DECISION MAKERS
- Modeling the values of private sector agents in multi-echelon Humanitarian supply chains
- Estimation of Attribute Weights from Preference Comparisons
- Minimum cost strategic weight assignment for multiple attribute decision-making problem using robust optimization approach
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Compatible weighting method with rank order centroid: maximum entropy ordered weighted averaging approach
- Rank-order weighting as a surrogate for direct weighting
- The conjunctive combination of interval-valued belief structures from dependent sources
- On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods.
- Multi-attribute decision making: an innovative method based on the dynamic credibility of experts
- The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis
- Combining sources of evidence with reliability and importance for decision making
- How well may the direct linguistic declarations substitute AHP in defining accurate criteria weights?
- Maximum likelihood solutions for multicriterial choice problems
- Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making
- Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights
- Preference change in stakeholder group-decision processes in the public sector: extent, causes and implications
- The value of assessing weights in multi-criteria portfolio decision analysis
This page was built for publication: Weight approximations in multi-attribute decision models
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4452459)
