Teichmüller distance is not C^{2+\varepsilon}

DOI10.1112/S0024611503014369zbMATH Open1134.30037OpenAlexW2092500664MaRDI QIDQ4460735FDOQ4460735

Authors: Mary Rees 

Publication date: 29 March 2004

Published in: Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1112/s0024611503014369

Recommendations

• Publication:4508511
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5556759
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2057275
• Teichmüller geodesics that do not have a limit in \(\mathcal PMF\)
• The distance between different components of the universal Teichmüller space
• The Teichmüller problem for L^p-means of distortion
• The Teichmüller space \(T_0\) is not starlike
• TEICHMÜLLER DISTANCE FOR ANALYTICALLY FINITE SURFACES IS C²
• Distance and angles between Teichmüller geodesics
• The Teichmüller distance on the space of flat conformal structures

zbMATH Keywords

quadratic differentialsBeltrami differentialsTeichmüller spaceTeichmüller map

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Teichmüller theory for Riemann surfaces (30F60) Moduli of Riemann surfaces, Teichmüller theory (complex-analytic aspects in several variables) (32G15)

Cited In (9)

• TEICHMÜLLER DISTANCE FOR ANALYTICALLY FINITE SURFACES IS C²
• Distance and angles between Teichmüller geodesics
• The parametrisation of the Teichmüller space by geodesic length functions
• Non-convexity of extremal length
• Visualizing the unit ball for the Teichmüller metric
• Isometric embeddings of Teichmüller spaces are covering constructions
• The Teichmüller distance on the space of spherical CR structures
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Teichmüller spaces and bounded symmetric domains do not mix isometrically

This page was built for publication: Teichmüller distance is not $C^{2+\varepsilon}$

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4460735)