The cosmological constant is probably zero, and a proof is possibly right

DOI10.1016/J.PHYSLETB.2007.12.019MaRDI QIDQ446964zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors Zhong Chao Wu

Publication date 8 September 2012

Published in Physics Letters B (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.3314

zbMATH Keywords

cosmological constantquantum cosmologyEuclidean quantum gravity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Quantization of the gravitational field (83C45) Relativistic cosmology (83F05)

Abstract: Hawking proposed that the cosmological constant is probably zero in quantum cosmology. Duff claimed that Hawking's proof is invalidated. Using the right configuration for the wave function of the universe, we provide a complete proof.

Recommendations

• Probable values of the cosmological constant in a holographic theory
• Why there is nothing rather than something: A theory of the cosmological constant
• Cosmological measure with volume averaging and the vacuum energy problem
• A SOLUTION TO THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT PROBLEM
• Publication:3719533

Cites work

• Dimensionality in the Freund-Rubin cosmology
• Pair creation of black holes in anti-de Sitter space background
• Wave function of the universe

Cited in

(11)

• Propagating \(q\)-field and \(q\)-ball solution
• Linking the Baum-Hawking-Coleman mechanism with unimodular gravity and Vilenkin's probability flux
• A simple proof of Birkhoff's theorem for cosmological constant
• Cosmological constant is a conserved charge
• Minkowski 3-forms, flux string vacua, axion stability and naturalness
• The cosmological constant is probably still zero
• Higher derivative three-form gauge theories and their supersymmetric extension
• A note on membrane interactions and the scalar potential
• Probable values of the cosmological constant in a holographic theory
• An axion-induced SM/MSSM Higgs landscape and the weak gravity conjecture
• The type IIA flux potential, 4-forms and Freed-Witten anomalies

This page was built for publication: The cosmological constant is probably zero, and a proof is possibly right

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q446964)