Calculus ratiocinator versus characteristica universalis? The two traditions in logic, revisited

DOI10.1080/01445340310001609315zbMath1100.03006OpenAlexW1978753518WikidataQ58539933 ScholiaQ58539933MaRDI QIDQ4472744

Volker Peckhaus

Publication date: 1 July 2004

Published in: History and Philosophy of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340310001609315

zbMATH Keywords

Fregehistory of logicLeibnizphilosophy of logicSchröder

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03) History of mathematics in the 19th century (01A55)

Related Items

Peirce’s Role in the History of Logic: Lingua Universalis and Calculus Ratiocinator ⋮ LINGUA CHARACTERICA AND CALCULUS RATIOCINATOR: THE LEIBNIZIAN BACKGROUND OF THE FREGE-SCHRÖDER POLEMIC ⋮ Editor's introduction to Jean van Heijenoort, ``Historical development of modern logic ⋮ Jean van Heijenoort's conception of modern logic, in historical perspective ⋮ Calculus as method or calculus as rules? Boole and Frege on the aims of a logical calculus ⋮ On Frege's Begriffsschrift Notation for Propositional Logic: Design Principles and Trade-Offs ⋮ The role of universal language in the early work of Carnap and Tarski ⋮ Husserl and the algebra of logic: Husserl's 1896 lectures ⋮ Uniting model theory and the universalist tradition of logic: Carnap's early axiomatics ⋮ Frege's \textit{Begriffsschrift} as a lingua characteristica ⋮ Gödel on Concepts

Cites Work

• On the development of the model-theoretic viewpoint in logical theory
• Logic as calculus and logic as language
• Logic in the twenties: the nature of the quantifier
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item