Calculus ratiocinator versus characteristica universalis? The two traditions in logic, revisited
DOI10.1080/01445340310001609315zbMATH Open1100.03006OpenAlexW1978753518WikidataQ58539933 ScholiaQ58539933MaRDI QIDQ4472744FDOQ4472744
Authors: Volker Peckhaus 
Publication date: 1 July 2004
Published in: History and Philosophy of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340310001609315
Recommendations
Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) History of mathematics in the 19th century (01A55) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Logic in the twenties: the nature of the quantifier
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Logic as calculus and logic as language
- On the development of the model-theoretic viewpoint in logical theory
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Was George Boole really the `father' of modern logic
Cited In (16)
- Uniting model theory and the universalist tradition of logic: Carnap's early axiomatics
- Peirce's role in the history of logic: \textit{lingua universalis and calculus ratiocinator}
- LINGUA CHARACTERICA AND CALCULUS RATIOCINATOR: THE LEIBNIZIAN BACKGROUND OF THE FREGE-SCHRÖDER POLEMIC
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Gödel on Concepts
- Calculus as method or calculus as rules? Boole and Frege on the aims of a logical calculus
- On Frege's \textit{Begriffsschrift} notation for propositional logic: design principles and trade-offs
- Frege's \textit{Begriffsschrift} as a lingua characteristica
- The reception of Leibniz's logic in 19th century German philosophy
- Three types and traditions of logic: syllogistic, calculus and predicate logic
- Editor's introduction to Jean van Heijenoort, ``Historical development of modern logic
- Jean van Heijenoort's conception of modern logic, in historical perspective
- Husserl and the algebra of logic: Husserl's 1896 lectures
- Logic as calculus and logic as language: too suggestive to be truthful?
- On universality and formality in 19th century symbolic logic: the case of Schröder's ``absolute algebra
- The role of universal language in the early work of Carnap and Tarski
This page was built for publication: Calculus ratiocinator versus characteristica universalis? The two traditions in logic, revisited
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4472744)
