Calculus ratiocinator versus characteristica universalis? The two traditions in logic, revisited
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4472744
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 733729 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1037169 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1549896 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3291106 (Why is no real title available?)
- Logic as calculus and logic as language
- Logic in the twenties: the nature of the quantifier
- On the development of the model-theoretic viewpoint in logical theory
- Was George Boole really the `father' of modern logic
Cited in
(16)- Uniting model theory and the universalist tradition of logic: Carnap's early axiomatics
- Peirce's role in the history of logic: \textit{lingua universalis and calculus ratiocinator}
- LINGUA CHARACTERICA AND CALCULUS RATIOCINATOR: THE LEIBNIZIAN BACKGROUND OF THE FREGE-SCHRÖDER POLEMIC
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2187178 (Why is no real title available?)
- Gödel on Concepts
- Calculus as method or calculus as rules? Boole and Frege on the aims of a logical calculus
- On Frege's \textit{Begriffsschrift} notation for propositional logic: design principles and trade-offs
- Frege's \textit{Begriffsschrift} as a lingua characteristica
- The reception of Leibniz's logic in 19th century German philosophy
- Three types and traditions of logic: syllogistic, calculus and predicate logic
- Husserl and the algebra of logic: Husserl's 1896 lectures
- Editor's introduction to Jean van Heijenoort, ``Historical development of modern logic
- Jean van Heijenoort's conception of modern logic, in historical perspective
- Logic as calculus and logic as language: too suggestive to be truthful?
- The role of universal language in the early work of Carnap and Tarski
- On universality and formality in 19th century symbolic logic: the case of Schröder's ``absolute algebra
This page was built for publication: Calculus ratiocinator versus characteristica universalis? The two traditions in logic, revisited
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4472744)