Leon Chwistek on the no-classes theory inPrincipia Mathematica

DOI10.1080/01445340310001614698MaRDI QIDQ4472747zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Bernard Linsky

Publication date 1 July 2004

Published in History and Philosophy of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340310001614698

zbMATH Keywords

criticism of no-classes theoryscope of class expressions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6371942
• Some remarks on nonstandard theory of classes
• On Russell and Whitehead's \textit{Principia mathematica}
• Classifiable theories without finitary invariants
• On the Leibniz–Mycielski axiom in set theory
• Prospects for a naive theory of classes
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3959419
• The functions of Russell's no class theory
• On interpreting Chaitin's incompleteness theorem
• THE POSET OF ALL LOGICS II: LEIBNIZ CLASSES AND HIERARCHY

Cited in

(7)

• The functions of Russell's no class theory
• Les classes dans lesPrincipia Mathematicasont-elles des expressions incomplétes?
• The Palgrave centenary companion to \textit{Principia mathematica}
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2152245 (Why is no real title available?)
• Leon Chwistek, The principles of the pure type theory (1922), translated by Adam Trybus with an introductory note by Bernard Linsky
• Typos of \textit{Principia mathematica}
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3895054 (Why is no real title available?)

This page was built for publication: Leon Chwistek on the no-classes theory inPrincipia Mathematica

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4472747)