Threshold resummation in SCET vs. Perturbative QCD: An analytic comparison

DOI10.1016/J.NUCLPHYSB.2012.04.010MaRDI QIDQ447374zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Marco Bonvini, Stefano Forte, Margherita Ghezzi, Giovanni Ridolfi

Publication date 3 September 2012

Published in Nuclear Physics B (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.6364

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nuclear physics (81V35) Perturbative methods of renormalization applied to problems in quantum field theory (81T15) (2)-body potential quantum scattering theory (81U05) Strong interaction, including quantum chromodynamics (81V05)

Abstract: We compare threshold resummation in QCD, as performed using soft-collinear effective theory (SCET), to the standard perturbative QCD formalism based on factorization and resummation of Mellin moments of partonic cross-sections. We consider various forms of the SCET result, which correspond to different choices of the soft scale mu_s that characterizes this approach. We derive a master formula that relates the SCET resummation to the QCD result for any choice of mu_s. We then use it first, to show that if SCET resummation is performed in N-Mellin moment space by suitable choice of mu_s it is equivalent to the standard perturbative approach. Next, we show that if SCET resummation is performed by choosing for mu_s a partonic momentum variable, the perturbative result for partonic resummed cross-sections is again reproduced, but like its standard perturbative counterpart it is beset by divergent behaviour at the endpoint. Finally, using the master formula we show that when mu_s is chosen as a hadronic momentum variable the SCET and standard approach are related through a multiplicative (convolutive) factor, which contains the dependence on the Landau pole and associated divergence. This factor depends on the luminosity in a non-universal way; it lowers by one power of log the accuracy of the resummed result, but it is otherwise subleading if one assumes the luminosity not to contain logarithmically enhanced terms. Therefore, the SCET approach can be turned into a prescription to remove the Landau pole from the perturbative result, but the price to pay for this is the reduction by one logarithmic power of the accuracy at each order and the need to make assumptions on the parton luminosity.

Recommendations

• THRESHOLD RESUMMING WITH TIME-LIKE PRESCRIPTION
• Higher-order corrections in threshold resummation
• Threshold resummation of new partonic channels at next-to-leading power
• Combined threshold and transverse momentum resummation for inclusive observables
• Renormalization group approach to soft gluon resummation

Cites work

• Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation
• Higher-order corrections in threshold resummation
• Invariant operators in collinear effective theory
• Renormalization group approach to soft gluon resummation
• Soft gluon resummation of Drell-Yan rapidity distributions: theory and phenomenology

Cited in

(7)

• The infrared structure of perturbative gauge theories
• Phenomenological behavior of the hard pomeron intercept
• Summing threshold logs in a parton shower
• Threshold resummation for computing large-\(x\) Parton distribution through large-momentum effective theory
• Open access paper on resummation of threshold singularities in the relativistic quasipotential approach
• THRESHOLD RESUMMING WITH TIME-LIKE PRESCRIPTION
• Muon-electron backward scattering: a prime example for endpoint singularities in SCET

This page was built for publication: Threshold resummation in SCET vs. Perturbative QCD: An analytic comparison

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q447374)