The 'improved' brown and forsythe test for mean equality: some things can't be fixed

DOI10.1080/03610919908813572zbMath0968.62535OpenAlexW1965938599MaRDI QIDQ4490198

H. J. Keselman, Rand R. Wilcox

Publication date: 11 July 2000

Published in: Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919908813572

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH) (62M10)

Related Items (8)

Tests for mean equality that do not require homogeneity of variances: do they really Work? ⋮ Robust weighted one-way ANOVA: improved approximation and efficiency ⋮ Welch’s ANOVA: Heteroskedastic skew-t error terms ⋮ Small sample properties of tests on homogeneity in one-way anova and meta-analysis ⋮ Testing for homogeneity in a general one-way classification with fixed effects: power simulations and comparative study ⋮ Choosing the best pairwise comparisons of means from non-normal populations, with unequal variances, but equal sample sizes ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ A parametric bootstrap approach for ANOVA with unequal variances: fixed and random models

Cites Work

• On the bootstrap and confidence intervals
• A one-way random effects model for trimmed means
• Improving the brown-forsythe solution to the generalized behrens-fisher problem
• ANOVA: The practical importance of heteroscedastic methods, using trimmed means versus means, and designing simulation studies
• Some Results on the Tukey‐Mclaughlin and Yuen Methods for Trimmed Means when Distributions are Skewed
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: The 'improved' brown and forsythe test for mean equality: some things can't be fixed