Not every Q-set is perfectly meager in the transitive sense
DOI10.1090/S0002-9939-00-05355-7zbMATH Open0958.03032OpenAlexW1994706179MaRDI QIDQ4501092FDOQ4501092
Authors: Andrzej Nowik, Tomasz Weiss 
Publication date: 3 September 2000
Published in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-00-05355-7
Recommendations
- On perfectly meager sets in the transitive sense
- On perfectly meager sets
- The strength of measurability hypotheses
- COUNTABLY PERFECTLY MEAGER SETS
- On \(G\)-transitive version of perfectly meager sets
- Perfectly meager sets and universally null sets
- Arbault permitted sets are perfectly meager
- The algebraic sum of a set of strong measure zero and a perfectly meager set revisited
- A big symmetric planar set with small category projections
- Universally meager sets
Descriptive set theory (03E15) Consistency and independence results (03E35) Other classical set theory (including functions, relations, and set algebra) (03E20) Other connections with logic and set theory (28E15)
Cites Work
Cited In (12)
- On \(G\)-transitive version of perfectly meager sets
- Dirichlet sets, Erdős-Kunen-Mauldin theorem, and analytic subgroups of the reals
- Remarks on small sets of reals
- On perfectly meager sets
- Arbault permitted sets are perfectly meager
- On perfectly meager sets in the transitive sense
- On the Class of Perfectly Null Sets and Its Transitive Version
- COUNTABLY PERFECTLY MEAGER SETS
- Products of Perfectly Meager Sets and Lusin's Function
- On the algebraic union of strongly measure zero sets and their relatives with sets of real numbers
- Universally meager sets
- Remarks about a transitive version of perfectly meager sets
This page was built for publication: Not every $Q$-set is perfectly meager in the transitive sense
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4501092)
