Not every $Q$-set is perfectly meager in the transitive sense

DOI10.1090/S0002-9939-00-05355-7zbMath0958.03032OpenAlexW1994706179MaRDI QIDQ4501092

Andrzej Nowik, Tomasz Weiss

Publication date: 3 September 2000

Published in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-00-05355-7

zbMATH Keywords

consistency\(Q\)-setalways first category setstrongly first category set

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Descriptive set theory (03E15) Consistency and independence results (03E35) Other classical set theory (including functions, relations, and set algebra) (03E20) Other connections with logic and set theory (28E15)

Related Items

On the Class of Perfectly Null Sets and Its Transitive Version ⋮ Universally meager sets ⋮ Dirichlet sets, Erdős-Kunen-Mauldin theorem, and analytic subgroups of the reals ⋮ On perfectly meager sets in the transitive sense ⋮ On the algebraic union of strongly measure zero sets and their relatives with sets of real numbers ⋮ On G-transitive version of perfectly meager sets ⋮ COUNTABLY PERFECTLY MEAGER SETS ⋮ Remarks on small sets of reals

Cites Work

• Universally meager sets
• Q-Sets, Sierpinski Sets, and Rapid Filters
• Some additive properties of special sets of reals
• The algebraic sum of sets of real numbers with strong measure zero sets
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item