Not every Q-set is perfectly meager in the transitive sense
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4501092
Recommendations
- On perfectly meager sets in the transitive sense
- On perfectly meager sets
- The strength of measurability hypotheses
- COUNTABLY PERFECTLY MEAGER SETS
- On \(G\)-transitive version of perfectly meager sets
- Perfectly meager sets and universally null sets
- Arbault permitted sets are perfectly meager
- The algebraic sum of a set of strong measure zero and a perfectly meager set revisited
- A big symmetric planar set with small category projections
- Universally meager sets
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3944823 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3996626 (Why is no real title available?)
- Q-Sets, Sierpinski Sets, and Rapid Filters
- Some additive properties of special sets of reals
- The algebraic sum of sets of real numbers with strong measure zero sets
- Universally meager sets
Cited in
(12)- On perfectly meager sets
- COUNTABLY PERFECTLY MEAGER SETS
- Arbault permitted sets are perfectly meager
- On perfectly meager sets in the transitive sense
- Remarks about a transitive version of perfectly meager sets
- Products of Perfectly Meager Sets and Lusin's Function
- Dirichlet sets, Erdős-Kunen-Mauldin theorem, and analytic subgroups of the reals
- On the algebraic union of strongly measure zero sets and their relatives with sets of real numbers
- On the Class of Perfectly Null Sets and Its Transitive Version
- Universally meager sets
- Remarks on small sets of reals
- On \(G\)-transitive version of perfectly meager sets
This page was built for publication: Not every $Q$-set is perfectly meager in the transitive sense
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4501092)