Small forcing creates neither strong nor Woodin cardinals
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4501093
DOI10.1090/S0002-9939-00-05347-8zbMATH Open0959.03040arXivmath/9808124MaRDI QIDQ4501093FDOQ4501093
W. Hugh Woodin, Joel David Hamkins
Publication date: 3 September 2000
Published in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: After small forcing, almost every strongness embedding is the lift of a strongness embedding in the ground model. Consequently, small forcing creates neither strong nor Woodin cardinals.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9808124
Cites Work
Cited In (19)
- On some properties of Shelah cardinals
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Gap forcing
- The least strongly compact can be the least strong and indestructible
- Certain very large cardinals are not created in small forcing extensions
- Exactly controlling the non-supercompact strongly compact cardinals
- Preserving levels of projective determinacy by tree forcings
- On tall cardinals and some related generalizations
- A note on tall cardinals and level by level equivalence
- Incompatible Ω-Complete Theories
- Strong compactness, square, GCH, and Woodin cardinals
- Choiceless Ramsey theory of linear orders
- Regular embeddings of the stationary tower and Woodin's maximality theorem
- Continuity of coordinate functionals of filter bases in Banach spaces
- Easton's theorem in the presence of Woodin cardinals
- Supercompactness and measurable limits of strong cardinals
- Set-theoretic geology
- Identity crises and strong compactness. III: Woodin cardinals
- Tall cardinals
This page was built for publication: Small forcing creates neither strong nor Woodin cardinals
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4501093)
