Does the third law of black hole thermodynamics really have a serious failure?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4521671

DOI10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/410zbMATH Open0963.83021arXivgr-qc/0009049OpenAlexW2953154829MaRDI QIDQ4521671FDOQ4521671


Authors: István Rácz Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 3 July 2001

Published in: Classical and Quantum Gravity (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The almost perfect correspondence between certain laws of classical black hole mechanics and the ordinary laws of thermodynamics is spoiled by the failure of the conventional back hole analogue of the third law. Our aim here is to contribute to the associated discussion by flashing light on some simple facts of black hole physics. However, no attempt is made to lay to rest the corresponding long lasting debate. Instead, merely some evidence is provided to make it clear that although the borderline between extremal and non-extremal black holes is very thin they are essentially different. Hopefully, a careful investigation of the related issues will end up with an appropriate form of the third law and hence with an unblemished setting of black hole thermodynamics.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0009049




Recommendations





Cited In (4)





This page was built for publication: Does the third law of black hole thermodynamics really have a serious failure?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4521671)