Do Dynamical Reduction Models Imply that Arithmetic Does Not Apply to Ordinary Macroscopic Objects?
DOI10.1093/BJPS/50.1.49zbMATH Open0989.81512arXivquant-ph/9810041OpenAlexW2039953581MaRDI QIDQ4527770FDOQ4527770
Angelo Bassi, Giancarlo Ghirardi
Publication date: 6 August 2002
Published in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9810041
General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15)
Cited In (8)
- A proposed solution to the tail problem of dynamical reduction models
- The problem of ontology for spontaneous collapse theories
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Finding your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories
- Dynamical reduction models
- GRW as an ontology of dispositions
- More about Dynamical Reduction and the Enumeration Principle
- In defence of naiveté: the conceptual status of Lagrangian quantum field theory
Recommendations
- Describing the macroscopic world: closing the circle within the dynamical reduction program 👍 👎
- Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories 👍 👎
- More about Dynamical Reduction and the Enumeration Principle 👍 👎
- Finding your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories 👍 👎
- The quantum theory of measurement within dynamical reduction models 👍 👎
This page was built for publication: Do Dynamical Reduction Models Imply that Arithmetic Does Not Apply to Ordinary Macroscopic Objects?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4527770)