Do Dynamical Reduction Models Imply that Arithmetic Does Not Apply to Ordinary Macroscopic Objects?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4527770
Abstract: We analyze a recent paper in which an alleged devastating criticism to the so called GRW proposal to account for the objectification of the properties of macroscopic systems has been presented and we show that the author has not taken into account the precise implications of the GRW theory. This fact makes his conclusions basically wrong. We also perform a survey of measurement theory aimed to better focus the physical and the conceptual aspects of the so-called macro-objectification problem.
Recommendations
- Finding your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories
- Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories
- Describing the macroscopic world: closing the circle within the dynamical reduction program
- More about Dynamical Reduction and the Enumeration Principle
- The quantum theory of measurement within dynamical reduction models
Cited in
(8)- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7660104 (Why is no real title available?)
- More about Dynamical Reduction and the Enumeration Principle
- Finding your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories
- GRW as an ontology of dispositions
- In defence of naiveté: the conceptual status of Lagrangian quantum field theory
- A proposed solution to the tail problem of dynamical reduction models
- Dynamical reduction models
- The problem of ontology for spontaneous collapse theories
This page was built for publication: Do Dynamical Reduction Models Imply that Arithmetic Does Not Apply to Ordinary Macroscopic Objects?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4527770)