On the success of mishandling Euclid's lemma
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4576565
DOI10.4169/AMER.MATH.MONTHLY.123.9.924zbMATH Open1391.11004arXiv1602.03555OpenAlexW2964198001MaRDI QIDQ4576565FDOQ4576565
Authors: Adrian W. Dudek
Publication date: 12 July 2018
Published in: The American Mathematical Monthly (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: We examine Euclid's lemma that if is a prime number such that , then divides at least one of or . Specifically, we consider the common misapplication of this lemma to numbers that are not prime, as is often made by undergraduate students. We show that a randomly chosen implication of the form is almost surely false in a probabilistic sense, and we quantify this with a corresponding asymptotic formula.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03555
Recommendations
- On the success of \textit{seriously} mishandling Euclid's lemma
- If a prime divides a product \dots
- Some analytical and computational aspects of prime numbers, prime number theorems and distribution of primes with applications
- Prime simplicity
- Did Euclid Need the Euclidean Algorithm to Prove Unique Factorization?
Arithmetic functions; related numbers; inversion formulas (11A25) Multiplicative structure; Euclidean algorithm; greatest common divisors (11A05)
Cites Work
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: On the success of mishandling Euclid's lemma
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4576565)