Classically integral quadratic forms excepting at most two values

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4577142

DOI10.1090/PROC/13891zbMATH Open1404.11038arXiv1608.01656OpenAlexW2964158559WikidataQ129772284 ScholiaQ129772284MaRDI QIDQ4577142FDOQ4577142

Author name not available (Why is that?)

Publication date: 17 July 2018

Published in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Let SsubseteqmathbbN be finite. Is there a positive definite quadratic form that fails to represent only those elements in S? For S=emptyset, this was solved (for classically integral forms) by the 15-Theorem of Conway-Schneeberger in the early 1990s and (for all integral forms) by the 290-Theorem of Bhargava-Hanke in the mid-2000s. In 1938 Halmos attempted to list all weighted sums of four squares that failed to represent S=m; of his 88 candidates, he could provide complete justifications for all but one. In the same spirit, we ask, "for which S=m,n does there exist a quadratic form excepting only the elements of S?" Extending the techniques of Bhargava and Hanke, we answer this question for quaternary forms. In the process, we prove what Halmos could not; namely, that x2+2y2+7z2+13w2 represents all positive integers except 5. We develop new strategies to handle forms of higher dimensions, yielding an enumeration of and proofs for the 73 possible pairs that a classically integral positive definite quadratic form may except.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01656




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (8)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Classically integral quadratic forms excepting at most two values

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4577142)