Counterexamples on spectra of sign patterns

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4577145

DOI10.1090/PROC/14041zbMATH Open1393.15043arXiv1612.05818OpenAlexW2582600862WikidataQ124818535 ScholiaQ124818535MaRDI QIDQ4577145FDOQ4577145


Authors: Ya. N. Shitov Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 17 July 2018

Published in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: An nimesn sign pattern S, which is a matrix with entries 0,+,, is called spectrally arbitrary if any monic real polynomial of degree n can be realized as a characteristic polynomial of a matrix obtained by replacing the non-zero elements of S by numbers of the corresponding signs. A sign pattern S is said to be a superpattern of those matrices that can be obtained from S by replacing some of the non-zero entries by zeros. We develop a new technique that allows us to prove spectral arbitrariness of sign patterns for which the previously known "Nilpotent Jacobian" method does not work. Our approach leads us to solutions of numerous open problems known in the literature. In particular, we provide an example of a sign pattern S and its superpattern S such that S is spectrally arbitrary but S is not, disproving a conjecture proposed in 2000 by Drew, Johnson, Olesky, and van den Driessche.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05818




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: Counterexamples on spectra of sign patterns

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4577145)