On the comparability of cardinals in the absence of the axiom of choice
DOI10.4064/FM376-11-2017zbMATH Open1459.03081OpenAlexW2802615715WikidataQ113999231 ScholiaQ113999231MaRDI QIDQ4581990FDOQ4581990
Authors: Eleftherios Tachtsis
Publication date: 21 August 2018
Published in: Fundamenta Mathematicae (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.4064/fm376-11-2017
Recommendations
axiom of choicecardinalsDedekind setsDedekind-finite setsJech-Sochor embedding theoremssymmetric models of ZFweak axioms of choiceRamsey's theorem for pairscomparability of cardinalsFraenkel-Mostowski (FM) permutation models of ZFAwell-ordered cardinals
Cites Work
Cited In (8)
- No decreasing sequence of cardinals
- An example of two cardinals that are equivalent in the \(n\)-order logic and not equivalent in the \((n + 1)\)-order logic
- Embedding orders into the cardinals with \(\mathsf {DC}_{\kappa} \)
- The cardinal inequality \(\alpha^2<2^{\alpha}\)
- Non-well-foundedness of well-orderable power sets
- A note on a property of maximal sets and choice in the absence of universal comparability
- On the set-theoretic strength of the existence of disjoint cofinal sets in posets without maximal elements
- A generalization of the trichotomy principle
This page was built for publication: On the comparability of cardinals in the absence of the axiom of choice
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4581990)