Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:4583317)
Recommendations
Cites work
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- Argument based machine learning
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
- Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study. I: The flat case
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
Cited in
(72)- Revisiting Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
- On the relation between claim-augmented argumentation frameworks and collective attacks
- On the instantiation of knowledge bases in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Instantiating knowledge bases in abstract dialectical frameworks
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- Initial sets in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- A normal form for argumentation frameworks
- Guaranteeing Admissibility of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Rationality and Feasibility Constraints
- Nonmonotonic tools for argumentation
- Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- Logical modes of attack in argumentation networks
- The matrix approach for abstract argumentation frameworks
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
- Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- A comparative study of some central notions of \(\mathit{ASPIC}^+\) and \textit{DeLP}
- Abstract argumentation systems
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger
- The attack as strong negation. I
- On supported inference and extension selection in abstract argumentation frameworks
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks: a logic programming approach
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
- Relating concrete argumentation formalisms and abstract argumentation
- On the semantics of simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- Bisimulation between base argumentation and premise-conclusion argumentation
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- When is argumentation deductive?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7084933 (Why is no real title available?)
- Dialogue games for argumentation frameworks with necessities
- Similarity measures based on compiled arguments
- On minimality and consistency tolerance in logical argumentation frameworks
- A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
- Sceptical and credulous approach to deductive argumentation
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Beliefs supported by binary arguments
- Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
- On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics
- On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations
- Beyond maxi-consistent argumentation operators
- A formal concept view of abstract argumentation
- A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks
- An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- A Logic of Abstract Argumentation
- Introducing abstract argumentation with many lives
- Logic-based approaches to formal argumentation
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Identifying the class of maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Generalized Abstract Argumentation: Handling Arguments in FOL Fragments
- Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation
- A dialectical proof theory for universal acceptance in coherent logic-based argumentation frameworks
- If nothing is accepted -- repairing argumentation frameworks
- A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based frameworks
- Graph theoretical properties of logic based argumentation frameworks: proofs and general results
- Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view
- Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6902516 (Why is no real title available?)
- Base argumentation as an abstraction of deductive argumentation
- Ideal extensions as logical programming models
- On the maximal and average numbers of stable extensions
- Infinite argumentation frameworks. On the existence and uniqueness of extensions
- Classical logic, argument and dialectic
- Logical argumentation principles, sequents, and nondeterministic matrices
- Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles
- Argumentation reasoning via circumscription with \textsc{pyglaf}
This page was built for publication: Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4583317)
