Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4583317
DOI10.1080/11663081.2013.830381zbMATH Open1400.68201OpenAlexW1979409532MaRDI QIDQ4583317
Publication date: 28 August 2018
Published in: Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2013.830381
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study. I: The flat case
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Argument based machine learning
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
Cited In (19)
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- Guaranteeing Admissibility of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Rationality and Feasibility Constraints
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
- When is argumentation deductive?
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Similarity measures based on compiled arguments
- A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
- An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP
- Dialogue Games for Argumentation Frameworks with Necessities
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view
- Base argumentation as an abstraction of deductive argumentation
- Revisiting Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
This page was built for publication: Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4583317)
