Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4583317
DOI10.1080/11663081.2013.830381zbMATH Open1400.68201OpenAlexW1979409532MaRDI QIDQ4583317FDOQ4583317
Authors: Leila Amgoud, P. Besnard 
Publication date: 28 August 2018
Published in: Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2013.830381
Recommendations
Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
- Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study. I: The flat case
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Argument based machine learning
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
Cited In (71)
- On the instantiation of knowledge bases in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Instantiating knowledge bases in abstract dialectical frameworks
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
- Initial sets in abstract argumentation frameworks
- A normal form for argumentation frameworks
- Maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Guaranteeing Admissibility of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Rationality and Feasibility Constraints
- Nonmonotonic tools for argumentation
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities
- Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
- Logical modes of attack in argumentation networks
- The matrix approach for abstract argumentation frameworks
- Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- A comparative study of some central notions of \(\mathit{ASPIC}^+\) and \textit{DeLP}
- Abstract argumentation systems
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- The attack as strong negation. I
- On supported inference and extension selection in abstract argumentation frameworks
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks: a logic programming approach
- Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger
- Relating concrete argumentation formalisms and abstract argumentation
- On the semantics of simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- When is argumentation deductive?
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Dialogue games for argumentation frameworks with necessities
- On minimality and consistency tolerance in logical argumentation frameworks
- Similarity measures based on compiled arguments
- A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness
- Sceptical and credulous approach to deductive argumentation
- Beliefs supported by binary arguments
- Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems
- Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
- On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations
- On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics
- A formal concept view of abstract argumentation
- Beyond maxi-consistent argumentation operators
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
- A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks
- Introducing abstract argumentation with many lives
- A Logic of Abstract Argumentation
- Logic-based approaches to formal argumentation
- Identifying the class of maxi-consistent operators in argumentation
- Generalized Abstract Argumentation: Handling Arguments in FOL Fragments
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- A dialectical proof theory for universal acceptance in coherent logic-based argumentation frameworks
- If nothing is accepted -- repairing argumentation frameworks
- Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation
- A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
- Simple contrapositive assumption-based frameworks
- Graph theoretical properties of logic based argumentation frameworks: proofs and general results
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view
- Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Base argumentation as an abstraction of deductive argumentation
- Ideal extensions as logical programming models
- On the maximal and average numbers of stable extensions
- Infinite argumentation frameworks. On the existence and uniqueness of extensions
- Classical logic, argument and dialectic
- Logical argumentation principles, sequents, and nondeterministic matrices
- Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles
- Argumentation reasoning via circumscription with \textsc{pyglaf}
- Revisiting Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
- On the relation between claim-augmented argumentation frameworks and collective attacks
This page was built for publication: Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4583317)
